Sign In
Create Account
Mazey Flyff
iMarimar
Thank you for the clarification Mister LEgionDark which I'm aware of. I hope JackSparrowYAY gets to read this since, this portion of the topic concerned him well. But then again thank you, thank you.
With all great respect LEgionDark and humblest appreciation of your concern. I'm not saying that PEOPLE here ARE not following me in my post its just that topics and subjects that doesn't concerned to discuss shouldn't be brought up here and I said that already.
If that's the cause we might end up running around the bush, and we don't want that. Right? Again, I repeat. I didn't mention the 10 siege participants in a guild. That's too many. I have thought of that and it would be a Clash for having as such. I, too have considered the possibilities that will happen if they will bring up the 10 participating members in siege in a Guild (same explanation with you guys). I'd rather stick to a 5 members Line Up per Guild. But, I pointed out a +3 add-on participants in a Guild that would make it 8 Participating Players.. However, I for one also consider what Miss Acacia suggested whichsoever she pointed out a +2 add-ons on the Siege Line Up in particular I couldn't agree more. Making it 7 total Siege players. Sound great huh!. Therefore, a 7 total Siege Players is much better for me. Thanks Thanks!
If your concern is survival then, you're on the track. Increasing the number of participants then, Increase in survival. Continually, If your concern is for earning points then, you're on the right track again! ^_^ Increasing the number of participants in the guild, in consequence, More to kill - Increased Winning Points. Afterall, I myself isn't after for the Earned Points nor the Crown and Medal. Its the Fun! The Enjoyment. The Entertainment which is the main goal and objective of this GAME.
Again, over and over again. Sounds redundant but.. 7 Siege Players is way better. not 10 but 7!!!
I have foreseen what could happen and very much aware of this post. Criticism, Critiques any forms of judgement. You're free to post and am willing to hear your side. I'm not pushing this suggestion since I have no say. But as of now I haven't seen and thought of nothing against this. Staffs have more knowledge than me because its their forte and the reason why they're assigned to incomparable tasks. Enlighten me then. =) =) =) Its much better to be argued and get noticed than ignored. Thank You so muchoo. =P
Fun fun fun
Love love love
LEgionDark wrote:From what I have read, which I will point out... Non-Donors are able to join the siege. I m talking about this in regards of NOT SPENDING any REAL MONEY IN DONATIONS TO MAZEY FLYFF PRIVATE SERVER. Non Donors are able to afford Full Donor Equipment from Donors, but it does take some time to farm enough Red Perins.
Thank you for the clarification Mister LEgionDark which I'm aware of. I hope JackSparrowYAY gets to read this since, this portion of the topic concerned him well. But then again thank you, thank you.
LEgionDark wrote:Another thing, We have people who has posted their comments because they have experience the game of Guild Siege Wars. Another thing, I can tell that we are following you in what you are saying, but it is not what you want to hear, because you are so eager of wanting Mazey to bring back the 10 Player line up.
With all great respect LEgionDark and humblest appreciation of your concern. I'm not saying that PEOPLE here ARE not following me in my post its just that topics and subjects that doesn't concerned to discuss shouldn't be brought up here and I said that already.
If that's the cause we might end up running around the bush, and we don't want that. Right? Again, I repeat. I didn't mention the 10 siege participants in a guild. That's too many. I have thought of that and it would be a Clash for having as such. I, too have considered the possibilities that will happen if they will bring up the 10 participating members in siege in a Guild (same explanation with you guys). I'd rather stick to a 5 members Line Up per Guild. But, I pointed out a +3 add-on participants in a Guild that would make it 8 Participating Players.. However, I for one also consider what Miss Acacia suggested whichsoever she pointed out a +2 add-ons on the Siege Line Up in particular I couldn't agree more. Making it 7 total Siege players. Sound great huh!. Therefore, a 7 total Siege Players is much better for me. Thanks Thanks! LEgionDark wrote:I took a look at this 5 man team vs 10 man team. So after looking at both sides by playing out the mock Guild Siege, I will like to point out that. Multiple Five-man teams have a better chance to survive then the few 10-man teams. Having multiple targets would basically have a longer period of earning points, which will decrease the chances of an one-sided battle.
If your concern is survival then, you're on the track. Increasing the number of participants then, Increase in survival. Continually, If your concern is for earning points then, you're on the right track again! ^_^ Increasing the number of participants in the guild, in consequence, More to kill - Increased Winning Points. Afterall, I myself isn't after for the Earned Points nor the Crown and Medal. Its the Fun! The Enjoyment. The Entertainment which is the main goal and objective of this GAME.
Again, over and over again. Sounds redundant but.. 7 Siege Players is way better. not 10 but 7!!!
I have foreseen what could happen and very much aware of this post. Criticism, Critiques any forms of judgement. You're free to post and am willing to hear your side. I'm not pushing this suggestion since I have no say. But as of now I haven't seen and thought of nothing against this. Staffs have more knowledge than me because its their forte and the reason why they're assigned to incomparable tasks. Enlighten me then. =) =) =) Its much better to be argued and get noticed than ignored. Thank You so muchoo. =P
Fun fun fun
Love love love
thanks
